About the Project

Independent technology publication

il.digital explains local AI from the model file to the physical machine running it. We follow the path through inference software, GPU memory, servers, networks, electricity and cooling—then show what those constraints mean for real people and businesses.

Local LLMs
Hardware
Inference
RAG
AI Servers

Software becomes physical somewhere

A model may arrive as a download, an API endpoint or a chat window, but its behaviour is shaped by physical infrastructure. We investigate where its weights live, how prompts become computation, why context occupies memory, where latency appears and what changes when several users share the same accelerator.

Our aim is not to make every system sound simple. It is to make the important trade-offs visible: capability versus memory, throughput versus latency, privacy versus operational responsibility, and specifications versus what a workload actually experiences.

Real mechanisms

We trace requests through software and hardware instead of describing AI as an abstract cloud service.

Measured questions

We separate specifications, published evidence, calculations and estimates—and identify what should be tested.

Operational consequences

We connect technical behaviour to cost, capacity, responsiveness, privacy and day-to-day reliability.

How we prepare articles

Technical reporting begins with current primary and authoritative sources: official documentation, standards, original papers, project repositories, model cards and manufacturer specifications where appropriate.

We do not present third-party benchmarks as il.digital tests. When performance depends on hardware, software versions, configuration or workload, those conditions should remain visible. Proposed first-party experiments are described as methodology until the measurements actually exist.

What readers can expect

Articles are designed to answer one clear question while showing the system underneath it. That may mean following data from storage to RAM and VRAM, comparing two serving architectures, examining a misleading metric or locating the first bottleneck that appears under load.

The publication covers beginner entry points as well as deeper infrastructure analysis. The standard is the same in both cases: accurate language, useful evidence and a practical understanding of what to inspect next.

Corrections and updates

AI models, runtimes and hardware support change quickly. Articles may be updated when documentation, specifications or the technical landscape changes materially. Substantive corrections should be made clearly rather than hidden behind a silent rewrite.

If you spot an error or want to suggest a topic, contact the editorial team.

Share to friends